Re: [swaml-devel] Is SIOC ontology interesting for SWAML?

From: Sergio Fernández

To: SWAML-Devel

Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:34:46 +0200

> It would be nice if you could release a version by the end of this week.
> In my opinion, your changes in the branch should be moved to the trunk.

Yes, indeed I just finished to adapt SWAML to implement SIOC ontology;
but first, before merging branch, I would like to know your opinion
about one detail:

Now, with the work made this week, SWAML are using only two property of
our ontology [1]:
	- swaml:previousByDate
	- swaml:nextByDate

These two properties haven't equivalent [2] in SIOC [3]. Then, not to
lose this important semantic relationship, obviously we must continue
using our ontology.

But my doubt is how:
    a) 	with actual ontology, without any change
    b) 	with a new release of our ontology deleting deprecated 
	properties
    c) 	with a new release of our ontology adding owl:equivalentTo 
	to reference SIOC on this deprecated properties

Perhaps the last one is most logical, but I haven't any experience about
these questions and I don't want to take a wrong decision.

Best regards

[1] http://swaml.berlios.de/ns/0.1#
[2]
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/swaml/branches/swaml-with-sioc/translate.txt
[3] http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/

-- 
__      ___ _   _           
\ \    / (_) |_(_)___ _ _   Sergio Fdez
 \ \/\/ /| | / / / -_) '_|  GNU/LiNUX User: #298803
  \_/\_/ |_|_\_\_\___|_|    Web: http://www.wikier.org/

_______________________________________________
SWAML-Devel mailing list
SWAML-Devel@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/swaml-devel

URI: http://swaml.berlios.de/demos/swaml-devel/2006-Sep/post-37

Link: http://swaml.berlios.de/demos/swaml-devel/2006-Sep/post-37.html

Has reply: http://swaml.berlios.de/demos/swaml-devel/2006-Sep/post-57

Previous by Date: http://swaml.berlios.de/demos/swaml-devel/2007-Jun/post-36

Next by Date: http://swaml.berlios.de/demos/swaml-devel/2007-Apr/post-38

Generated by SWAML